Juden

Zensur! Fuckerzwergbook hat es schon wieder getan! Aufklärung und Wahrheit wird unterdrückt und gelöscht, halbnackte Kinder und Pädophilenseiten aber nicht!

Welcher Jude macht denn die Gemeinschaftsstandards bei Facebook? Dieses Video wurde vor weniger als 2 Wochen von Geschichtsrevision gelöscht: 

Unbenannt

Adolf Hitler – Antwort an US-Präsident Franklin D. Roosevelt – Hier in voller Länge:

Vor wenigen Minuten wurde nun auch noch dieses Video von Mut zur Wahrheit gelöscht:

removeEbenfalls hier in voller Länge:

Mein ehemaliges Profilbild, dafür haben sie mich wieder mal 30 Tage gesperrt:

we are goyim

Aber solche Seiten mit halbnackten Kindern die auch noch schöne Mädchen heißen könnt ihr melden so oft ihr wollt, sie werden nicht entfernt und das pädophile Judenpack das sich darauf rumtreibt hetzt auch noch über den Islam und macht sich über den Führer lustig:

jews

ninas

Dafür gibt es jetzt als Bonus noch

ADOLF HITLER – Rede gegen die Neue Weltordnung (Berliner Sportpalast, 1940)

 

Und

ADOLF HITLER – DIE VERBOTENE REDE

WAR IS OUT TRUTH IS IN

Hört gut zu was dieser Mann euch zu sagen hat, denn er wusste schon damals ganz genau was passieren würde wenn man diese kriminellen Elemente machen lässt was sie wollen, ihr erlebt es jeden Tag in diesem Land und überall auf der Welt, und demnächst direkt vor eurer Haustür!

Zensur! Fuckerzwergbook hat es schon wieder getan! Aufklärung und Wahrheit wird unterdrückt und gelöscht, halbnackte Kinder und Pädophilenseiten aber nicht!

Welcher Jude macht denn die Gemeinschaftsstandards bei Facebook? Dieses Video wurde vor weniger als 2 Wochen von Geschichtsrevision gelöscht: 

Unbenannt

Adolf Hitler – Antwort an US-Präsident Franklin D. Roosevelt – Hier in voller Länge:

Vor wenigen Minuten wurde nun auch noch dieses Video von Mut zur Wahrheit gelöscht:

removeEbenfalls hier in voller Länge:

Mein ehemaliges Profilbild, dafür haben sie mich wieder mal 30 Tage gesperrt:

we are goyim

Aber solche Seiten mit halbnackten Kindern die auch noch schöne Mädchen heißen könnt ihr melden so oft ihr wollt, sie werden nicht entfernt und das pädophile Judenpack das sich darauf rumtreibt hetzt auch noch über den Islam und macht sich über den Führer lustig:

jews

ninas

Dafür gibt es jetzt als Bonus noch

ADOLF HITLER – Rede gegen die Neue Weltordnung (Berliner Sportpalast, 1940)

 

Und

ADOLF HITLER – DIE VERBOTENE REDE

WAR IS OUT TRUTH IS IN

Hört gut zu was dieser Mann euch zu sagen hat, denn er wusste schon damals ganz genau was passieren würde wenn man diese kriminellen Elemente machen lässt was sie wollen, ihr erlebt es jeden Tag in diesem Land und überall auf der Welt, und demnächst direkt vor eurer Haustür!

New Facebook Rules: Sharing This Article Might Get You Banned – The Pontiac Tribune

New Facebook Rules: Sharing This Article Might Get You Banned


NEW FACEBOOK RULES: THE COMPANY HAS DECIDED TO BECOME AN ENFORCEMENT ARM OF THE US THOUGHT POLICE.


Justin King (The Fifth Column) – Facebook revamped its community standards yesterday. One of the most chilling changes is that users can now be banned for supporting or praising “criminal” activities.

Facebook has said it will remove content in support of violent or criminal organizations. The company also throws out the word “terrorists.” Facebook, being an international company, will end up being the arbitrator of which groups are terrorists and which groups are freedom fighters.

We also remove content that expresses support for groups that are involved in the violent or criminal behavior mentioned above. Supporting or praising leaders of those same organizations, or condoning their violent activities, is not allowed.” – Facebook

Which side is it ok to support in Ukraine? Is it ok to support or condone Palestinians? What about Anonymous, the “cyber-terrorist” collective? Supporting the protesters in Ferguson? Russian dissidents speaking out against Putin? What about supporting the US military, which has been called a terrorist organization by other countries?

censor

Facebook has decided to become the world’s censor. This may end up being the final nail in the coffin of a social media outlet that has seen users flee from other idiotic policies.

In addition to a ban on supporting organizations that Facebook has decided it doesn’t like, the social media giant has decided it’s time to protect the politicians they have bought.

In a section labeled “attacks on public figures,” the company says it won’t tolerate “hate speech” directed at public figures. What qualifies as hate speech? It doesn’t say in that section.

Elsewhere in the standards it identifies hate speech as:

Content that directly attacks people based on their:

Race, Ethnicity, National origin, Religious affiliation, Sexual orientation, Sex, gender, or gender identity, or Serious disabilities or diseases.

Organizations and people dedicated to promoting hatred against these protected groups are not allowed a presence on Facebook.”

So, I guess Tea Partiers can no longer call the President a Muslim in a derogatory fashion. Democrats can’t mock Romney for having more than one wife.

Facebook has established rules that are so broad that they allow the company to censor whatever they wish. Let’s be clear, Facebook is a private company and therefore they can ban whatever they choose. We as private citizens can also demand that a US-based company abide by the ideas of the country.

The First Amendment was not written to protect recipes, selfies, videos of cats, or statements about the weather. The First Amendment was written to protect the objectionable and the offensive. The First Amendment was written to protect these statements from my newsfeed today on Facebook:

“Obama is a hypocritical war-monger. That Muslim traitor needs to go.”

“These Christian fundamentalist scumbags in congress should be drug out of office and beat. That letter was f-cking treason.”

“One day some old Guinea is going to shoot an old Asian. We’ve already had to stop one neighbor from beating the shit out of an Asian kid for parking repeatedly in his driveway. Lack of basic respect for others or their property is not acceptable.”

“Erin Go Braugh” (A statement of support for the Irish Republican Army)

“I like my guns like that n-gg-r likes his sp-cs. Unregistered.”

“We are legion.” (Statement of support for Anonymous)

“He’s a jew, and a Mossad agent.” (Said about Islamic State leader Al-Baghdadi.)

“Putin can suck my d-ck like the f-gg-t he is.”

“That pilot was bombing children. They burned alive. I don’t care that they lit him on fire. It’s the only thing America’s puppets understand.” (Said about Jordanian pilot burned alive by the Islamic State.)

“Cops wear vests. Aim high.”

“You’re a g-dd-amn-ed piece of sh-t. You and your Mick buddies and all you drunken Irish sheep f-ckers should f-cking die a horrible death.” (Said to me because I don’t have a problem with gays marching in the St. Patrick’s Day parade.)

“We need to start beheading those f-cking c-cksuckers like they do our kids. Islam is not a realigion of peace.”

“The only sad thing about the Ferguson shooting is that those cops didn’t die.”

“Free Barrett Brown! Free Jeremy Hammond! F-ck Sabu’s F-gg-t a—with a pinecone.”

Is my newsfeed pretty diverse? Yes. Are some of these statements offensive? Sure. Should they be banned? Of course not.

If you only believe in supporting Free Speech that supports your opinion or the opinion of your fellow “Sheep f-ckers,” you don’t support the idea of Free Speech. Should Nazis be able to post on Facebook? Sure. Should Jews be able to troll them mercilessly and advocate violence against them? Yep. Welcome to Free Speech.

keyboardcuffs

There is no good that can come from cutting off access to other opinions. Facebook’s real message is pretty clear in regards to criminal conduct:

“Obey the government or be banned.”

via New Facebook Rules: Sharing This Article Might Get You Banned – The Pontiac Tribune.

Strafbarkeit…

Strafbarkeit…totenkopf2

Das [jüdische] Amtsgericht und Landgericht Lübeck hat durch Urteile vom 1. Juni 2001 und 16. Januar 2002 entschieden, dass das Zeigen von Totenköpfen durch eine „rechtsgerichtete Person“ eine strafbare Verwendung eines verfassungswidrigen Kennzeichens [welcher Verfassung?] gemäß [ungültigem] § 86a StGB ist. Diese Urteile wurden durch den Beschluss [der Juden] des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Oberlandesgerichtes vom 31. Oktober 2002, aber auch durch den Beschluss [der Juden] des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes vom 9. Januar 2003 und sogar durch den Beschluss [der Juden] des Europäischen Menschengerichtshofes vom 13. Juli 2005 bestätigt.

******************************

Deutsches Militär :
Als Symbol der Todesverachtung und Zeichen des bedingungslosen Gehorsams unter Einsatz des Lebens wurde er von ungarischen, dann polnischen und später preußischen Reitertruppen auf ihren Pelzmützen bereits im 16. Jahrhundert getragen.

Einer der ersten Freikorps stellte Ferdinand von Schill 1809 aus seinem ehemaligen Husarenregiment auf. Es kämpfte während des Fünften Koalitionskrieges gegen die Invasoren aus Frankreich. Die Schill’schen Jäger (auch als Schill’sches Freikorps bekannt) trugen eine Totenkopfmütze.

In den Freiheitskriegen um 1813 finden wir den Totenkopf auf den Mützen der Schill’schen-, bzw. Lützow’schen Jäger. Bedeutende Angehörige dieser Freischaren waren Ludwig Jahn, Theodor Körner, Friedrich Friesen. Ab dieser Zeit wurde der Totenkopf von deutschen Husaren-Kavalleristen bis 1918 getragen und wieder ab 1923 vom Stoßtrupp-Hitler der späteren Stabswache, der Keimzelle der 1925 neu aufgestellten Schutz-Staffel (SS).

Die Soldaten der Panzertruppe der Wehrmacht trugen zur schwarzen Dienstuniform Totenköpfe auf beiden Kragenspiegeln, weshalb sie zuweilen mit der Waffen-SS verwechselt wurden.

Staatlicher Goldraub oder Die Versklavung der Menschheit oder Executive Order 6102

Die Executive Order N° 6102 wurde vom Juden und Präsidenten der VSA, Franklin Delano Rosenfeld oder „Roosevelt“ wie er sich nannte, am 5. April 1933 veröffentlicht, also nur 13 Tage nach der jüdischen Kriegserklärung an Deutschland vom 24. März 1933.

Um den Goldabfluss aus den USA zu stoppen, dehnte der nächste jüdische Präsident Dwight D. Eisenhower (der deutschstämmige Halbjude und Deutschenhasser Eisenhauer) am 14. Januar 1961 mit der Executive Order 10905 das bisher auf das Inland beschränkt gewesene Verbot des privaten Goldbesitzes auf die von US-Bürgern im Ausland unterhaltenen Goldbestände aus. Es war allen US-Bürgern und Unternehmen untersagt, Goldbestände oder gegen Gold einlösbare Wertpapiere (Goldzertifikate) in ausländischen Depots zu halten und sich am Goldhandel zu beteiligen. Bis zum 1. Juni 1961 mussten alle Golddepots aufgelöst werden. Bei Verstößen gegen dieses Verbot drohten empfindliche Geldstrafen bis zu 10.000 US-Dollar oder Gefängnisstrafen bis zu zehn Jahren. Von diesem Verbot waren seltene Goldmünzen ausgenommen.

Executive_Order_6102

Executive Order 6102, klicken zum vergrößern

march-24-1933-daily-express-judea-declares-war-on-germany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Es gibt kaum deutschsprachige Seiten welche diese Executive Order N° 6102 behandeln, die deutsche Lügipedia Seite zum Goldverbot ist hier. Daraus ein Auszug:

Bei einem Goldbesitzverbot müssen Privatpersonen ihren Besitz an Gold (Münzen, Barren, Nuggets, Zertifikate) an staatlichen Annahmestellen abgeben und erhalten eine Entschädigung in der Landeswährung ausgezahlt. Sie dürfen Gold meist nur noch in Form von Schmuck und Münzsammlungen bis zu einer gesetzlich festgelegten Wertgrenze besitzen. In den USA lag beispielsweise im Jahre 1933 diese Wertgrenze bei 100 US-Dollar. Ausnahmen bestehen oft für Branchen, in denen mit dem Edelmetall gearbeitet wird, wie beispielsweise Juweliere, Kunsthandwerker und Zahnärzte. Im Dritten Reich gab es – neben dem Verbot des Privatbesitzes – auch ein Verbot des gewerblichen Goldbesitzes.

Ein Besitzverbot wird meist von Regierungen erlassen, wenn sich Staaten in einer Währungskrise befinden. Die Gründe für eine Währungskrise können in schlechten makroökonomischen Fundamentaldaten liegen (z.B. hohe Staatsverschuldung), so dass ein fester Wechselkurs drastisch überbewertet ist. Die Anleger erwarten langfristig eine Korrektur des Paritätskurses und bringen mit ihrer „Spekulation gegen die Währung“ die Krise zum Ausbruch. Weil sie eine starke Abwertung erwarten, meiden sie die unsichere Währung und investieren in Edelmetalle sowie vermeintlich sichere Währungen („Kapitalflucht“). Um die Währung zu stützen, erlassen Regierungen Gesetze und Verordnungen, die eine Erfassung sowie Einziehung von Edelmetallen (Gold, Silber, Platin) und Devisen zum Ziel haben. Die Goldablieferungspflicht dient außerdem dazu, mit dem abgelieferten Gold lebenswichtige Importe zu finanzieren.

Das Goldverbot ist meistens verbunden mit strafrechtlichen oder ordnungsrechtlichen Sanktionsdrohungen. Besitzverbote sind als Eingriffe in das Grundrecht auf Eigentum besonderen Voraussetzungen der Rechtmäßigkeit unterworfen. Sie sind in der Regel nicht sehr effektiv, da viele Privatpersonen ihre Goldbestände nicht angeben oder auch nicht abliefern. Wo der Goldbesitz verboten ist, blüht entweder der Goldschmuggel, der die schwarzen Märkte – gegen ein entsprechendes Aufgeld – versorgt, oder die Bürger kaufen das Gold im Ausland.

Der Sinn dieses Goldverbotes für Privatpersonen wird grade heute daraus ersichtlich dass das Gold der Staaten, das sich eigentlich in den VSA im Fort Knox befinden sollte, niemandem zugänglich und einfach so „verschwunden“ ist, die Währungen der Welt werden schon lange nicht mehr durch das Gold gestützt und die letzten die sich weigerten den Goldstandard abzuschaffen wurden von den Amerikanern ausgebombt, ausgeraubt und besetzt.

Gold ist also als Zahlungsmittel durch wertloses Papiergeld ersetzt worden.

Solche Goldverbote ziehen sich durch die Geschichte aller Länder dieser Welt. Nachdem die jüdischen Bankster vor dem 1. Weltkrieg durch die Erschaffung der Federal Reserve Bank (FED) erreicht hatten das Monopol der Gelddruckerei an sich zu reißen (da war das Geld noch durch das Gold gedeckt), wollten sie nun auch noch das Monopol des Goldes an sich reißen was ihnen fast gelungen wäre hätte sich der energische Mann aus Österreich ihnen nicht in den Weg gestellt um diese Finanz- und Zinsknechtschaft zu brechen.

Das war der wirkliche Auslöser für den 2. Weltkrieg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
http://www.usagold.com/gildedopinion/gold-confiscation-ganz.html
http://silverbulletsilvershield.com/most-popular/sbss-enemy-unknown-proof-like.html
http://libertythinkers.com/education/gold-standard-myths-and-facts-part-2/
http://www.zeitenschrift.com/artikel/die-gold-verschwoerung
http://schwertasblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/22/der-hintergrund-des-verrats-amerikaner-werden-gelehrt-die-feinde-der-juden-zu-hassen-und-toten/

What really happened?

Do you want to look at all the evidence and form your own opinion?

Critical thinking and the HolocaustWhatreallyhappened.info is based in the United Kingdom and devoted to free inquiry into historical events.

Disclaimer: We link to a wide variety of sites, videos, etc. You may, will, disagree strongly with some of them, since they represent differing viewpoints; you may even find some offensive. Our linking to them in no way implies our support for any views expressed in them. It implies only that we think that viewing them may help us or you to a better understanding of the issues, even where we reject what is said.

This site exists to promote an open scientific, evidenced-based approach to historical enquiry. We do not believe or reject anything, though naturally we do form opinions. However, they are just that: opinions based on our current understanding of the facts. We are not emotionally attached to them and we would have no problem with changing our current positions on any subject if the evidence suggested we should.

We are mainly, though not exclusively, interested in the Second World War and the German treatment of Jews during that conflict, since this is the area where free enquiry is most actively and efficiently suppressed by force of law and imprisonment in some countries and by taboo in all. The topic is protected from any objective investigation by an electric fence of emotion and insult, with the result that few other than those with a political axe to grind dare question the received story. We have no such axe. We have looked at the orthodox story and at the arguments brought against it by Revisionists, and we find that, at the very least, the Revisionists have raised questions  which so far have not been satisfactorily answered. They are met with insults and ad hominem accusations of political bias, which, even if they are true (they are in some cases but not in others) are irrelevant, since the historical facts of what happened in the 1940s cannot be influenced by anyone’s views today on anything. The reality is that those who promote the orthodox story are themselves also largely driven by emotion and political bias. On the whole, whatever their motives, it is the Revisionists, not the proponents of orthodoxy, who have looked for material evidence and applied scientific methodolgy.

We don’t like the term Holocaust; we think it represents a dishonest approach used to impose a narrative and to suppress enquiry, rather than encourage actual study of what happened. It has entered the vocabulary relatively recently, promoting a politically-motivated, anti-intellectual, emotional and manipulative memorialism, which was analysed by Dr Norman Finkelstein (a Jewish-American university professor) in his best-selling book The Holocaust Industry.

We are not neo-Nazis; we are not so-called „White Nationalists“ or any other kind of racist; we do not believe „it was all a Jewish conspiracy“, but we do have genuine and sincere doubts, based on our reading of the historical record and the arguments of both sides, most of which is completely absent from the mass media which serve a hysterical diet of tear-jerking accusations but very few verified facts.

Though individuals behind the site have differing personal views, the one thing we are unanimous on is the right to investigate freely.

We will also point you to aspects of history that, although indisputably true, are almost entirely absent from the mainstream media. For example, take a look at a map of pre-war Germany and compare it with a map of Germany today. The 15 million Germans in that „missing“ area, as well as the Sudetenland and other areas, were Germans expelled from Czechoslovakiadriven out with extreme brutality, including mass rape and murder, by Russians, Poles, Czechs, Serbs and others, with hundreds of thousands, perhaps as many as two million deaths. They too were transported in „cattletrucks“ (which were actually goods vans, but that doesn’t have the same emotive ring). It was the largest of manydeportations and expulsions in Eastern Europe. They have fallen into history’s memory hole. How much have they received in reparations? When did you last see a TV programme, a film or a newspaper article about any of them? The present writer knows of only one: Shadow Over Europe made by Charles Wheeler for BBC4 in 2002. It has only recently become available on YouTube.


[If the above embedded link is not working, click here]

We welcome views that differ from our own, provided always that they are presented objectively, calmly and courteously without resort to rudeness or invective, and we promise to do our best to show similar courtesy to others. We are looking for historical evidence and dialogue, not polemic and confrontation. We don’t seek to demonise, sanctify or whitewash anyone. Not Hitler, not Stalin, not Churchill or anyone else…

Do we deny the Holocaust?

Like „Do we still beat our wives (or husbands)?“ the question is impossible to answer as it is based on a false assumption. „Holocaust denial“ is a simplistic Newspeak term, designed to shut down discussion by falsely presenting the issue as black or white, all or nothing, and implying that anyone questioning any part of it must have malicious motives. The truth is more complex.

Much of what is called the Holocaust did beyond question take place:

  • The National Socialist or Nazi regime intensely disliked Jews and prior to the war succeeded in expelling two thirds of them from Germany. They had the cooperation of the Jewish Zionist movement, which wanted Jews to move to Palestine.
  • Following the outbreak of war, most Jews in the areas under German control (though not most French Jews) were confined in ghettos, concentration camps and labour camps, where conditions varied from the low standards common in most prisons to the utterly appalling, and where many died (and were cremated) from a wide range of causes which included privation, exposure, disease, neglect, maltreatment (often by the common-criminal prisoners who were placed in authority) and execution.
  • The war on the Eastern front was one of the most barbaric wars in history and civilians were routinely killed by both sides as reprisal or simply to spread terror. It was savage warfare, but it has its parallels in Algeria and Vietnam, for example. Given both official and personal attitudes to Jews on the German side, and the high number of Jews among both partisans and Communist commissars, Jews were likely to figure prominently among the victims.
  • In 1945, conditions of utter horror, with thousands of unburied emaciated dead, were found when camps such as Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were liberated.

We in no way dispute these component parts of the larger event which since about 1980 has become labelled as the Holocaust.

But other main components are far from „proven beyond reasonable doubt“

Revisionists argue, with some justification, that there is no material evidence, and only documentary evidence whose provenance has never been adequately tested, that:

  • there was mass murder in gas chambers (There were small gas chambers which were used to kill disease-spreading lice in clothing and bedding using Zyklon B, a legitimate commercial product, stabilised hydrogen cyanide, used in all German military facilities and still produced today under the trade name Uragan D2 uragan is a direct Czech translation of zyklon, cyclone or storm)
  • the Nazi regime sought to exterminate the European Jews (or any other group)
  • the totemic figure of six million Jewish deaths has a basis in fact
  • the appalling conditions with thousands of dead bodies found in Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were a consequence of deliberate German brutality or neglect

The last point should not be at issue. All historians and other knowledgeable people now accept that these horrific scenes were caused by epidemics and starvation in the total collapse of infrastructure at the end of the war and by massive overcrowding as inmates of the camps in Poland were moved to camps in Germany that had no space for them, but little effort has been made to communicate this knowledge to the general public and photographs taken at these camps are regularly and falsely presented in the media as „proof of the Holocaust“.

The accusations of mass killing in gas chambers rely entirely on:

Both gas chambers and extermination were regarded by the Nuremberg Tribunals and the later SS trials in Germany as „facts of common knowledge“ and therefore unquestionable. For a defendant to dispute them was a sure way to the hangman’s noose or a very long time in prison. The only possible defence or mitigation was to say that these things happened but to deny or play down your own role in them. Some received lighter sentences for confessing or for testifying against others (plea bargaining). The first Commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hoess, said at Nuremberg that while he was in charge 3 million had died in the camp of whom 2.5 million were murdered. From this a total of 4 million was extrapolated and inscribed on a monumental inscription at Auschwitz where it remained until the early 1990s, when it was reduced to just over 1 million with no attempt to distinguish between murders and natural deaths, the public being left to assume that all were gassed. So even according to the official figure, we know that Hoess was forced to exaggerate three- or four-fold. It was never clear what proportion of the four million were Jews but of the present figure 1 million are claimed to have been Jewish. Either way 3 million people are suddenly unaccounted for. Similar massive reductions in the number of alleged dead have been made for other camps–Dachau, Treblinka, Majdanek, etc, yet the canonical 6 million never budges.

No actual homicidal gas chambers have ever been found

The alleged gas chamber at Auschwitz 1, shown to tourists, was „reconstructed“ by the Russians in 1947 on the site of a crematorium and morgue, later used as an air raid shelter (with gas-tight door). Until the mid-nineties, it was presented to visitors as „original“. Auschwitz 1 alleged reconstructed gas chamberEven today the public are encouraged to believe it is in its original state and you will only be told it is a „reconstruction“ if you actually ask, or go to a very obscure corner of their web site (last paragraph on that page). At Auschwitz 2 (also known as Birkenau) there are only ruins of buildings whose plans and specifications in the Auschwitz Construction Office are for crematoria and morgues, with nothing to identify them as gas chambers; the ovens are standard crematorium design for individual bodies and their capacity is far too low for the mass murderous use claimed for them. Majdanek has gas chambers used to kill lice in clothing and bedding, using Zyklon B, which it is alleged, without evidence, were also used to kill people.

This comes as a great surprise to most people, who have been taught that the Holocaust is „the most documented event in history“ and that it is beyond dispute that six million Jews were killed. In reality, thedeportations, the camps and the crematoria are thoroughly documented, but that is all.

Since the universal image of the Nazis as unique symbols of evil incarnate is based on these beliefs, we no longer accept this extreme view of the German Hitlerite regime, though we are certainly are in no way apologists for it: we see it as no more, and probably rather less murderous than the brutal Stalinist regime in Russia, our ally to whom we handed over half of Europe, turning it into a world superpower. We look at the historical record and try to get an objective picture of what happened and to understand why individuals, groups and nations acted as they did. What are viewed as war crimes in comfortable armchair retrospection must be seen in the context both of brutal total war and of similar or comparable actions by our own side.

If there really is so little evidence to support these allegations of deliberate mass murder, how can it be that they are near-universally believed?

This is a complex issue, but in outline:

After the war:

That there were gas chambers in Germany is no longer believed since as long ago as 1960. An extraordinary admission. Only the camps in Poland, then conveniently unavailable for inspection behind the Iron Curtain, continued to be considered „death camps“. Since they became accessible, Auschwitz 1 has been acknowledged to be a fake by the Auschwitz Museum authorities and ground surveys at Treblinka and Belzec have produced little of substance.

Since the late 70s:

  • A „Holocaust Industry“ has emerged. The subject is ever-present in the media in a way that was never the case in the thirty years that followed the war

Belief in „The Holocaust“ is imposed on Western society by a combination of:

  • force of law: in most of Europe people are jailed for years or heavily penalised financially for „denying the Holocaust“. Most of these laws do not date from the post-war period but were introduced in the last twenty or thirty years, in Hungary as recently as 2011
  • intellectual and academic taboo: academics who raise questions are persecuted and excluded (Joel Hayward for example), with the result that only those who are prepared to toe the party line dare address „the Holocaust“
  • media censorship: critical perspectives are totally absent from the mainstream media, which simply regurgitate everything they are fed by the Holocaust Industry and actively promote it (see above)
  • a campaign of memorialisation that has turned „the Holocaust“ into a into a dogmatic religious belief that may not be questioned, on pain of being branded a heretic and an outcast
  • emotional „education“ programmes which ignore objectivity, context, evidence and historical methodology in general and are little more than brainwashing; they are often taught in Religious Studies rather than in History
  • branding any attempt at objective assessment as „Holocaust denial“ and implying that all „deniers“ are antisemitic, racist, neo-Nazi thugs

This is the only event in the history of the world that is surrounded by such an electric fence of taboo and criminalisation, forbidding any objective historical investigation. We want to open up the memory holes so that all relevant evidence can be seen and evaluated, and to establish a fair and balanced assessment of what really happened.

Churchill wrote a 6-volume History of the Second World War. He did not mention gas chambers or extermination. Neither did Eisenhower nor De Gaulle in their memoirs.

How can such an extraordinary three-fold omission be explained? Was the extermination of 6 million people really so unimportant?

How could the Holocaust not be true? by Jewish blogger Paul Eisen.
For those with a little more time we recommend Joel Hayward’s thesis.
Hayward, who has some Jewish ancestry, never identified as a Revisionist; he simply wrote an MA thesis comparing the Revisionist and orthodox arguments. He was attacked with the full force of the New Zealand Jewish establishment, who demanded his degree be withdrawn and he be fired from his lecturer position. They brought in Richard Evans (who had appeared against David Irving in his libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt).

Hayward had a nervous breakdown and was almost driven out of academia. He only managed to survive by leaving his native New Zealand for Britain and abandoning any work connected with the Holocaust. He specialised in air power and has had a brilliant career becoming Dean of the RAF College at Cranwell. He is now Chair of the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at Khalifa University in Abu Dhabi.

via What really happened?.

Klara Marcus überlebte Auschwitz, weil den Nazis das Gas ausging – News Ausland – Bild.de

„DER LIEBE GOTT HAT IN AUSCHWITZ AUF MICH AUFGEPASST“Ich überlebte nur, weil 
den Nazis das Gas ausging

(Anm.d.Red.: Ich habe selten so einen Schwachsinn gelesen, typisches BILD-Klärgruben-Niveau. Erstens wurde, wie man heute weiß, niemand vergast und zweitens, wenn es doch so gewesen wäre hätte die sonst sehr gründliche Waffen-SS die Leute erschossen. Geht schneller und ist ungefährlicher.)

Jetzt wird die Holocaust-Überlebende (Lügnerin) Klara Marcus 101 Jahre alt

VergrößernMit 30 Jahren sollte Klara Marcus im KZ Auschwitz vergast werden

Mit 30 Jahren sollte Klara Marcus im KZ Auschwitz vergast werden – sie überlebte

 

Foto: Action Press

Klara war 30 Jahre alt, als sie sich nackt auszuziehen und in die Gaskammer gehen sollte. Es war 1944 und die junge Klara war Gefangene im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz.

„Der liebe Gott hat an dem Tag auf mich aufgepasst“, sagte das Geburtstagskind gegenüber der Agentur „Central European News“. Heute lebt sie im rumänischen Sighetu Marmatiej.

Gemeinsam mit vielen anderen Frauen sei sie an diesem Tag ausgewählt und für die Gaskammer vorbereitet worden. „Aber als sie uns in den Raum gestellt haben und das Gas anstellen wollten, merkten sie, dass es leer ist“, erzählt Marcus.

„Einer der Aufseher scherzte daraufhin und meinte, dass das unser Glückstag sei – sie hätten einfach schon viel zu viele Menschen getötet, sodass für uns kein Gas mehr übrig ist.“

Am 27. Januar 1945 wurde Auschwitz durch sowjetische Truppen befreit. Zwischen 1940 und 1945 wurden in dem Konzentrationslager 1,1 Millionen Menschen ermordet

Weiterführende Links zum Thema:

http://deutscher-freiheitskampf.com/2014/06/01/die-gaskammertemperatur-nachgewiesen-anhand-gerichtlich-bekannter-zeugenaussagen-und-forensischer-untersuchungen-2/

http://deutscher-freiheitskampf.com/2014/10/10/das-experiment-zur-erforschung-der-gaskammertemperatur/

http://deutscher-freiheitskampf.com/2013/08/31/das-gaskammerratsel-im-gerstein-bericht/

http://deutscher-freiheitskampf.com/2014/07/27/das-gaskammertemperatur-paradoxon/

via Klara Marcus überlebte Auschwitz, weil den Nazis das Gas ausging – News Ausland – Bild.de.